Posts
On The Hunt • Re: TALES OF WELLS FARGO (1957)
15 hours ago
Friday, March 30, 2012
Friday FAIL
In some ways, I believe these are FAILs. Some of you may think of them as WINs. In either case, enjoy!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 comments:
Thanks Hermione.
I suppose how you decide if it's fail or a win comes from which perspective you have, or which 'end' of the spectrum you're on.
You're very welcome.
True, and someone always disagrees with my decision, but that's life!
I get the fail on the first couple, the perspective is frat house, not adult relationship (to me). But the last one just made me LOL, so that must have been a WIN for me. :)
I agree it's funny, and a FAIL as an example of advertising in the sixties.
I was going to say your right Hermione all fails but the last one made me laugh as well so it has to be a win.
Love,
Ronnie
xx
The last one was so funny!
Love,
Kitty
Hermione, were you looking for some 'ice cubes', to 'cool' that voluptous bare bottom of your's, after your husband gave you a good spanking? If so thats a 'win, win'.
Good call, Hermione. I think these are FAILs too, although the last one made me grin a bit.
I wonder if anyone bothered to ask which one of the couple the pool boy preferred?
Prefectdt
Luv the 2nd cartoon: Mmmm . . . yummies!
BTW, and please forgive my naivite,
but what is a FAIL?
and what is a WIN?
I guess they can be a little of each.
It sure was kinda strange:)
Six, that would always be a WIN!
The FAILs are getting easier to find all the time. I wonder why?
That ad prompts a lot of questions in my mind.
The term FAIL comes from Failblog.org and is a general way of classifying something that just isn't right, or a situation or picture where something goes wrong, or is inappropriate.
A WIN is just the opposite.
always show admiration for a woman's bottom, so I would consider the first two a win win situation. The last one would only work if he was so inclined... rather a fail..and a reason for never purchasing this product with such a lame presentation.
hugs
Red
Hmmm . . .
A little bit of editoralising, methinks,
;-)!
Interesting that your classifications are the opposite of many of the other readers. I agree the third ad is a pretty good reason for staying away from Jantzen.
Post a Comment