What are your thoughts on submission?
Jack: I don't know
if submission is the right word. My wife/mommy knows what is best, I
accept, the marriage has been great, the sex life can't complain, but
the spankings and sex do not go together. I know I can't help myself at
times, and I know that a spanking is coming, and I can complain, beg,
plead, to no avail. I accept the spankings but not how much my bare
bottom is stinging and sore afterwards. So for me, having a wife/mommy
is very good even tho the spankings hurt and the bathbrush insures that.
Rosco: Submission
is important to me and Irene. A spanking without a lecture is a bit
empty. The physical sensation is delicious, but for me the turn on is
dependent also on the reprimand for my disputatious, obstreperous,
recalcitrant ways. Irene has quite the vocabulary.
Roz: Our dynamic
has gone through many changes over the years. Submission and permission
used to play an important part at various times, depending on the nature
of the dynamic at the time. Spanking nowadays is purely for fun.
Prefectdt: I think that
submission is very important in play, for me, but mostly revolves
around physical submission. Play always seems enhanced when I am made an
automaton of the other person in the play session. This is most
illustrated when the other participant is an inexperienced player and,
from necessity, I am topping from the bottom. If, for example, I think
that the spanker might get a better target if I am in another position, I
will ask to be told to move to another position, rather than moving by
my own command. Giving physical control of my body to someone else gives
a high sense of submission and helps bring on the "Dancing with the
Fairies" high.
Mija: Submission
is important, but not automatic. I can play without it, but then the
play is much more about the physical sensation, maybe even the
playfulness, of being spanked. I like the sense of submission, my
physical and emotional submission, being valued, maybe even insisted on
by person topping. Maybe because when I'm submissive I'm feeling
vulnerable and so it would hurt me to have those submissive feelings not
matter, not be valued. If they've insisted I submit then I feel like
that submission has been seen and that it matters.
KDPierre: Regardless
of the reason, spanking is an inherent power imbalance that requires one
party to submit to the other. In this exchange, pain is being given by
one party to the other who accepts that pain for whatever motives move
them. I'm not sure how any spanking can even happen without 'submission'
taking place, even if that submission does not extend past the spanking
itself. I have noticed that some people fairly bristle at the notion of
submission being involved and therefore kind of redefine the term so
that they can say it is not happening. But that's just the modern world
we live in and that trend is not in any way limited to spanking and
submission.
Perhaps if someone dictates precisely what they want,
control it utterly and sort of use the spanker as almost a service
employee, I suppose you could say they aren't submitting but just
consenting to receive pain, but even then.....the spanker is still kind
of in the dominant position.
Books and essays have been written about this topic, so I'm not sure if a post reply can do it justice.
A.J.: "Sense" of submission? Sure.
An actual full-time submissive in all things? No thanks.
Hermione: I am definitely a submissive, and Ron is a natural dominant, so we
complement each other. I usually ask his permission to do things like
going shopping or making major changes around the house. He does not normally say no, but prefers that I ask rather than just go ahead on my
own. Spanking naturally requires submission on my part, even though I crave it.
Slava Ukraini
Glory to Ukraine