Welcome back for another weekend brunch where we discuss all things spanking. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of spank is "to strike especially on the buttocks with the open hand". (An interesting bit of trivia: the word was first used in 1712. I wonder where.) But sometimes spanking happens on other parts of the body.
How do you feel about being spanked on places on your body other than your bottom? Do you love it or hate it? Is it a regular occurrence or does it only happen occasionally?
Leave your reply as a comment. You may remain anonymous if you wish. After everyone has had a chance to speak I will publish a summary of our discussion.
Posts
11 comments:
HUH! There is no other place to be spanked but on the bottom.
Since a lot of the time I'm playing at Spanking Parties--in other words, with people I've probably just met within the last few hours or days--spanking anywhere else on the body would be highly inappropriate. Even with ladies I know well, I would never do it. The bottom area is the perfect place for spanking. 'Nuff said!
I've been spanked on the backs and fronts of my thighs, I've had floggers used on my back and on my nipples and very rarely on an even more sensitive part of my anatomy. I very much prefer that my bottom is punished but it doesn't hurt (well metaphorically anyway) to experiment and as the saying goes "a change is as good as a rest".
She says my bottom is made for spanking and that is where she mostly concentrates. Every once in awhile she will have me spread my legs and will spank my inner thighs with the wooden spoon.
archedone
I only spank on a female's bare bottom. Sometimes with a hand, paddle, hairbrush, birch rod, or cane. Of course I prefer her to wear suspender-belt and stockings, which makes her naked derriere, more sexually and erotically exciting.
I agree with the others, general. The bottom is the only place to spank when spanking is called for. It is the only part of the body that is sufficiently padded to absorb a spanking. Any other location might lead to injury.
Baxter
I agree with the others, general. The bottom is the only place to spank when spanking is called for. It is the only part of the body that is sufficiently padded to absorb a spanking. Any other location might lead to injury.
Baxter
No, thank you. My bottom is round and wide and very well padded. No other body part could stand up to a real spanking. Nor would we ever want to try.
I grudgingly tolerate a few swats on the very tops of my thighs because that's part of getting a spanking.
A strike anywhere else would just inflict senseless pain. It wouldn't ignite any of my sexy spanking cravings or classic corporal punishment fantasies. Nope, no interest here.
Bottoms Rule ! OK ?
I have a love/hate relationship with being spanked on the thighs. The thighs are just so much more sensitive.
Of course, when we are doing more BDSM things, I get whacked in plenty of other places. But I don't consider that spanking. Spanking is limited to my bottom, thighs, and...private bits.
I have been spanked between the legs on my intimate parts and I'd like that to happen again.
Thighs I hate but accept as it's part of the spanking. P's also used the flogger (small suede one) lightly on my back and bottom. Quite a sexy feeling.
Love,
Ronnie
xx
Post a Comment